🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.